PROFESSOR BEN
ONYEUKWU (REV)
NCE,
(ENG.) ND/HD (JOURNALISM), DIP; BA, (THEOLOGY), MA, PhD
Leadership and followership
Introduction:
According to Iloeje, Audu and Anozie
(2001:33), for one to know what leadership and followership mean, one must
first of all find out who is a leader and who is a follower. In view this,
Ukegbu Merry and associates put forth that, a leader is a person who shows the
way and guides another person or group of persons to attain a goal or
accomplish a task, as well as define a follower as, ‘anyone who accepts the
authority of another person, obeys his instruction and yields to his advice. In
an attempt to inspire a better understanding of who is a leader, and who is a
follower, Iloeje, Audu and Anozie cite that, “society generally has people who
tell others what to do, and others who do what they are told to do. According
to them the first set of people lead, whereas, others follow. So, the first
sets of people are leaders and the second sets are followers.
Having cited the above, what is
therefore, leadership and what is followership?
The meaning of leadership:
Ikwumelu in Ajaegbo and Ibezim (2001:45) remarks that, “the
term ‘leadership” is derived from the Latin word, ”ductus”, meaning to lead”.
He equally notes that, leadership as a word appears in virtually all the fields
of study and in each of these fields, it evokes different and varied meanings.
In the words of Iloeje, Audu and Anozie, “leadership is therefore, the service
of leading people”, whereas, Alexander (2011:51) says, it is the state or
position of being a leader.
Types of Leadership
leadership is of various types and
numerous. However, in this course, we shall be looking at the following:
1. Family leadership:
According to Iloeje, Audu and Anozie
(2001:34), “in the family situation, the father is the leader. He occupies the
family leadership position, and other members of the family are followers, who
he guides, maintains and protects.
2. Traditional Leadership:
The
traditional leadership position is occupied by a traditional ruler. Ukegbu and
associates (2010:48) opine that, this kind of leadership is based on a people’s
custom. Therefore, a traditional ruler
may be defined as someone who rules the people in line with their customs. In
Nigeria, the Igbos call them “ezes” the Yoruba people refer to them as “obas”,
and the Hausa community call them “emirs”, etc.
3.
Religious Leadership
Religious
leadership is the type of leadership found in religiou institutions. For
instance, in Christian religion, the
bishop, pastor, elder are in leadership positions. In Islamic religion, the
imam is in charge, and in traditional religion, the chief priest is known to be
occupying the leadership position.
4.
Political leadership:
Iloeje, Audu
and Anozie (2001:35) posit that, “political leadership” is of various types,
and the leaders run different types of political systems or governments,
and these they cite as follows:
(a)
Monarchy:
These are
political leaders who become leaders because they are born in a royal family.
Such leaders are called monarchs, and their political leadership type or system
is called a monarchy.
(b)
Aristocracy
Aristocracy is that type of political leadership
occupied by people from rich and powerful families. Such leaders are referred
to as aristocrats. some very powerful kings in the Middle East are aristocrats.
(c)
Autocracy:
Also,
Iloeje, Audu and Anozie (2001:35) cite that, “when a political leader rules all
by himself, he assumes full and total power and issues laws and orders without
consulting anyone, he is a dictation and he runs a dictatorship or a
totalitarian or autocratic government. Hitler was a dictator in Germany in the
1930s.
(d)
Democracy:
Democracy is said to be “government of the people, by the people and for
the people”. In this type of political leadership, the leader has a cabinet of
advisers with whom he discusses and whose combined views he takes to ensure
that the collective will of the people is achieved.
(e)
Gerontocracy
Gerontocracy is cited where political leadership is assumed by the
elders in the society. In this type of political leadership, the elders who are
in power rule by consultation and consensus
Functions of leadership
According
to Ikumelu in Ajaegbo and Ibezim (2001:56) leadership functions consist of,
first, helping the group to find the means to a goal already agreed upon, and
second, helping the group to decide upon a goal. More typically, individuals
come to be accepted as leaders because they provide focus for existing or
emerging values and beliefs.
Burgoon et
al, (1974:147) outline a number of leadership functions some of which are
hereunder discussed.
1.
Initiation function:
The leader ought to originate and facilitate new ideas and practices. It is
equally his duty to resist new ideas when, in his own estimation, they are
inappropriate.
A leader that clings to the
status quo and resists change by all means is soon faced with stressful
followers and general uprising. A laissez-faire leader is rarely an initiator.
2.
Membership function:
A leader should ensure that he is a member of the group. He achieves this by
mixing with the followers, emphasizing informal interaction, and taking care of
their socio-emotional needs. An autocratic leader is lacking in this function.
3.
Representation/Defiance Function: A leader should act as the spokesman of the group and
defend the members from external threats.
The ability of the leader to carry out this function determines the
rating of the group by others, and the rating of the leader by the group.
4.
Organization function: A leader should structure his own work and
that of others. Involvement of the follower in the setting of organization
objectives and in evaluation makes the execution of this function possible.
5.
Integration function: A leader should posses the skill of conflict
resolution or crises management. He should at all times strive to create and
sustain conducive industrial environment and individual happiness.
6.
Gate-keeping Function: A leader should function as filter and
manager of information entering and leaving the group in interactive
relationship with other groups. This is referred to as gate-keeping function.
7.
Reward function:
The leader evaluates and assesses the performance of the followers. He
expresses approval or disapproval of their behaviour, via material rewards such
as salary increases or by conferring status, praise, or recognition. In all these, he allows objectivity to hold
sway.
8.
Production function:
In some cases, a leader is responsible for getting a task done. When this is
the case, he has to device ways and means of achieving the objective without
neglecting the socio-emotional needs of the followers.
Qualities
of good leadership
Good
leadership must demonstrate certain qualities if progress would be made in an organization.
In line with this, Alexander (2011:54) outlines that a good and true leader is
one who does his work honestly. In other words, a good leader is honest and:



















The
meaning of followership:
In the words of Iloeje,
Audu and Anozie (2001:33), “followership means the status of a follower or the
act of following a leader, and according to Alexander (2011:52), “followership
refers to the act of supporting an ideas or person or group of persons, etc.
However, Ikwumelu (2001:49) stresses that, “followership as a term is
often used in conjunction with leadership. It therefore, shares most of the
problems associated with the latter. It has an added difficulty of delineating
a follower- after all, a follower at a given set-up could be a leader, and in
another set-up , a follower, as he stresses further that:
1. An individual who is a follower in
one situation may be a leader in another situation.
2.
Leaders and followers control one
another’s behaviour.
3.
Follower’s compliance is evoked by
coercion, persuasion or conviction.
4.
Methods appropriate for the control
of behavior of one group might be unsuitable for another group.
5.
Followership has as much
responsibility as the leadership in ensuring group cohesion and continuity in
organizational structure.
6.
There is closer understanding
between followership and leadership in a democratic setting than in any other
leadership-followership orientation.
7.
Followership is greatly influence by
the socio-political environment within which it operates.
QUALITIES
OF GOOD FOLLOWERSHIP
Alexander
(2011: 55), also says that the qualities of good followership are:









ROLES OF A GOOD
FOLLOWER:
According to Ikwumelu (2001:59), a good follower is an:
1.
Initiator: He should be able to propose or
initiate new ideas, procedures, objectives and solutions to emerging and
existing problems.
2.
Integrator:
A good follower integrates the ideas or activities of other members following a
clarification of the relationship between various facts, opinions and
suggestion.
3.
Information Manager:
He relates personal experiences relevant to the achievement of group objective,
and seeks clarification when necessary.
4.
Opinion giver/taker:
A good follower freely offers his own opinion on issues concerning the group and
solicits the opinions and feelings of other group members.
5.
Elaborator:
He clarifies and expands the ideas of others through examples, illustrations
and explanations. He maintains objectivity and empathy in this exercise.
ROLES OF A BAD
FOLLOWER:
Ikwumelu also cautions that the
following roles of a follower are dysfunctional and should be avoided:
1.
Recognition seeker: This type of follower invites
comments that focus on his achievements successes. He boasts of his skills,
intelligence and purity of character.
2.
Dominator: The follower monopolizes group interaction
and wants to have everything his own way
3.
Anecdote: The follower tells irrelevant stories, and in
his bid to attract attention he dwells on irrelevant anecdotes.
4.
Aggressor:
The follower insults and criticizes others. He exhibits jealousy and ill will.
5.
Blocker:
the follower constantly and consciously objects to others’ ideas and
suggestions despite the appropriateness of these ideas and suggestions. Through
this negative attitude, he prevents progress in all spheres of group
interrelationship.
6.
Special-interest pleader: The follower represents the interest of a different group.
His loyalties lie outside the group he apparently belongs to.
In conclusion,
and according to Iloeje, Audu and Anozie
(2001:33), there is no leader without
a follower, since a leader cannot lead himself . In the same way, there
is no follower without a leader, since a follower must follow someone else, not
himself . Consequently, leadership and followership go together. They are two
sides of a coin, and no doubt, this is why experts consider the terms as a
subject –matter.
References:
Alexander,
O.A. (2011), standard civic Education,
Book 2,
Tonnimas & Company,
Nigeria.
Ajaegbo
D.E, ibezim, E.O.(2001), citizenship Education in Nigeria, an Interdisciplinary
Approach, Solomon Publishing Coy.
Onitsha, Nigeria.
Iloeje,W.P, Anozie C.O.E, and Audu, A.R.E (2001)21ST Century Edition, Junior
Secondary Social Studies, Inselberg (Nigeria)Ltd, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ukegbu,
M.N, Mezieobi, K., Ajileye, G., Abdulrahaman
B.G., and Anyaoha,
C.N.(2010), Basic civic Education, for Junior Secondary Schools,
Alphabet Nigeria publishers, Owerri, Nigeria
.
No comments:
Post a Comment